They plan to take him out during a funeral ceremony, but as the man has been a recluse, getting a positive ID proves difficult. the only one i like is roger ebert, at least he knows wat he is talking about.The United States armed forces have a lead on a suspected terrorist in Baluchistan, Pakistan. alot of them are volunteers, i mean wat makes his opinion any better than anyones elses, all they do is tell people not to see movies. also these film critics are a bunch of fuckin idiots. so let him do wat he wants and accept it, back to the movie, it was a fun ride with lots and lots of thrills and action, and it was original. i have no problem seeing him in movies and i dont care how many he does, the fact is hes fantastic and hasnt done a bad movie. ya this movie wasnt the best but it was friggen good and alot better than u guys make it, and for all of u who think shia is not a good actor u are wrong, hes a very talented kid with a bright future ahead, god forbid the kid does his job and is in movies. I agrees with the other guy that says u all are full of shit. I know I'm ranting, but lately with the elections I've just been getting more and more pissed about people having an inability to be objective about anything □ Don't hate a whole project (movie) just cause of one guy. I don't knock MI3 just because Tom Cruise is crazy, cause, he did a good job in it. I don't like Shia at all either, but I'm not gonna knock a whole movie just because I don't like a person. If you watch it for what it IS- a popcorn flick that will probably keep you on the edge of your seat, then yeah you'll have a pretty good time. so is just about every freakin movie ever, ever. Even if the subject wasn't believable and quite a bit ridiculous, well. BUT, what it WAS, was very suspenseful and fairly entertaining. After the first 10 minutes I had to tell myself "get over it and suspend all belief, this is a movie after all." For those who know what's going on in the movie its obvious its not original by any means. and 2 of those stars are only because there are almost naked hot chicks running around it the whole movie.Ī more accurate rating of this movie would be like a 6.5 (with a star variance depending on who rated it). See, when I think of a "3 out of 10" I think of a movie like "Dead or Alive". The idea has been tweaked and updated a bit, sure, but Eagle Eye is definitely baked from a well-worn recipe. With LaBeouf headlining a film like this, you would at least hope for an original storyline. If Spielberg did come up with the original idea, I certainly hope it was more than a decade ago, because the central tenet of Eagle Eye is frustratingly familiar. It was neither.īut even when you can see the story's full landscape, it's a disappointing view. Eagle Eye would have been much better off fessing up to this part upfront, instead of trying to be sneaky and clever. It's only about half-way through the movie that this part of the story is made clear. It's hard to talk much about it without giving it all away, but as you witness Jerry and Rachel receiving instructions and being monitored wherever they go, you get a distinct feeling that the film is fucking with you by not revealing the truth behind the voice. The film also thinks it's clever in masking the truth behind the female caller. Jerry Shaw (Shia LaBeouf) dashes into a building a race against time in Eagle Eye. Why would somebody with such omnipotent influence have to blackmail and threaten individuals to do its bidding? The mechanical femme fatale on the other end of the phone can somehow miraculously sever power lines on a whim, but it must rely on Jerry Shaw ( LaBeouf) and an unremarkable Rachel ( Michelle Monaghan) to accomplish an important mission? If the whole thing sounds contrived, that's because it is. Eagle Eye fails in crafting itself a likable position, since, ironically, the film can't see how truly stupid it really is. I definitely enjoy the likes of Michael Bay and am perfectly willing to go for a mind-numbing ride. Eagle Eye may look promising on paper, but no degree of ridiculous gadgetry or blinding car crash can keep you from seeing the real truth - the film is an explosive disappointment.įilms that occupy the space of flashy, big-budget actioners are usually pretty vapid affairs. But you know what they say about judging a book by its cover. Caruso from the respectable Disturbia, and the original idea for Eagle Eye came from Steven Spielberg, no less. My expectation seemed reasonable, since the film reunited LaBeouf and director D.J. Shia LaBeouf is unquestionably a hot commodity nowadays, and after seeing the previews for Eagle Eye, I had grounds to expect it to be the next blockbuster thriller. Kevin's Review: Eagle Eye - A Familiar and Disappointing Sight
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |